stockfish chess benchmark ryzen 1800x 7700k intel

#Stockfish chess benchmark ryzen 1800x 7700k intel driver

In the tests, the overclocked 1700X scores 19874 points compared to Intel's 6950X's 15695 points which is utter destruction of Intel's flagship in terms of both pricing and performance.

#Stockfish chess benchmark ryzen 1800x 7700k intel driver

Wilson AMD Focuses Major CPU Performance Per Watt Improvements On Linux With P-State EPP Driver This processor retails for an insane price that's well above $1700 US. The Core i7 6950X is Intel's flagship processor, boasting 10 cores and 20 threads which are more than AMD's 8 core and 16 threads. Here, the AMD 1700X is being compared against the Core i7 6950X from Intel. The second performance test is in the CPU-Z multithreaded benchmark. AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Vs Intel Core i7 6950X Multithreaded CPU Performance Benchmark The AMD 1700X will retail at $399 US which is a little bit higher than the 7700K's $339-$350 price range. The Core i7 7700K is Intel's fastest clocked processor and AMD beating it with their new Ryzen is something to be excited about. The AMD 1700X processor scored 2327 points in the benchmark compared to the 7700K's 2301 at stock speeds.

The Intel Core i7 7700K chip clocks at 4.5 GHz boost clock on single core enabled. The Ryzen 7 1700X clocks in around 3.8 GHz boost and a little above 4 GHz with the XFR (Extended Frequency Range) feature. Speed.Dev.#2.: 12747.9 kH/s (81.AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Vs Intel Core i7 7700K Single-Threaded CPU Performance Benchmarkįirst we have the single-threaded scores so we have the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and the Core i7 7700K in direct comparison.

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit Hashtype: SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) iSSHA-1 Hashtype: Juniper NetScreen/SSG (ScreenOS) Hashtype: md5crypt, MD5 (Unix), Cisco-IOS $1$ (MD5) Hashtype: descrypt, DES (Unix), Traditional DES Hashtype: MS-AzureSync PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials 2 (DCC2), MS Cache 2 Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials (DCC), MS Cache Hashtype: nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA Hashtype: nsldap, SHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SHA Hashtype: Apache $apr1$ MD5, md5apr1, MD5 (APR)

Hashtype: IPB2+ (Invision Power Board), MyBB 1.2+ Hashtype: SMF (Simple Machines Forum) > v1.1 Hashtype: SIP digest authentication (MD5) Hashtype: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth etype 23 Hashtype: phpass, WordPress (MD5), phpBB3 (MD5), Joomla (MD5) Hashtype: Skip32 (PT = $salt, key = $pass) * Device #1: Intel(R) HD Graphics 630, skipped. Hashcat (v3.6.0) starting in benchmark mode. What's even more hilarious is that the 1800X isn't much faster than the 1700X with Hashcat, and the 1700X is actually faster than the 1800X for MD4/NTLM because the 1800X draws so much power and runs so hot, even with a big-ass cooler, that it has to throttle itself down below the base clock to prevent itself from imploding - just like their GPUs! By contrast, the 7700K was able to Turbo all day long and remain quite cool. Yeah the instructions are there, but they don't have any 256-bit registers, so you gain nothing by using AVX2. But for everything else the 7700K absolutely wrecks the 1800X - while costing a fraction of the price, drawing a fraction of the power, running a hell of a lot cooler, and it even has onboard graphics which the 1800X lacks.Īnd speaking of AVX2, this test was important because it confirms that Ryzen's AVX2 support is a bold-faced lie. For example, the 1800X is 57% faster than the 7700K on bcrypt. Now, as expected (and I failed to mention this in my previous posts but it was rather implied), the 1800X is faster for algorithms where we cannot leverage AVX2 on the 7700K, because it has twice the number of cores. I know I said that the 7700K would be ~13% faster, and it's hard for me to admit this, but I was wrong.